State v. Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the first prong of Fritz was not met where it was \quite apparent . . . that a motion made by defense counsel on the theory now advanced on appeal had no real chance of success\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walker
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-03-10· cited 38×
• Wallace v. City of Atlantic City
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-04-21· cited 13×
• State v. Bilancio
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-02-19· cited 13×
• State v. Goodson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-11-09· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Ker v. California
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
• State v. Fritz
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-14· cited 1,823×
• Miller v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 1,055×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-06-04· cited 125×
• State v. Fair
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-06-14· cited 102×
• State v. Jordan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-06-04· cited 28×
• State v. Jordan
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-10-05· cited 11×