Skip to main content

State v. Lott

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 555

Syllabus

Civ.R. 60(B)(4); postconviction-relief petition; intellectual disability; capital; death penalty; successive petitions. - Judgment reversed and remanded. The trial court abused its discretion in denying Lott's motion as a successive petition for postconviction relief because it was properly filed pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B). Res judicata should not bar Lott from challenging his capital sentence when the reason for the Civ.R. 60(B) did not exist at the time Lott filed his previous petitions and postconviction appeals.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.