New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2/8/1990
State v. Lopez
Citations
- 787 P.2d 1261
- 109 N.M. 578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding under model penal code intent to restore stolen property to the owner is an affirmative defense
- RSP conviction supported by evidence that defendant was present at time of theft and worked in concert with alleged thief to return property for reward
- RSP conviction supported by evidence that defendant was present at time of theft and worked in concert with alleged thief to return property for reward
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Bivins, Minzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 47×
- State v. SizemoreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-28· cited 35×
- State v. OroscoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-07-02· cited 33×
- State v. SavageNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-02-24· cited 25×
- Jessica A. Lihlakha v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-04-24· cited 16×
- State v. BuendiaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-01-09· cited 13×
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-12-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.