Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/16/2000
State v. Logan
Citations
- 10 P.3d 504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to consider the State’s argument for an extension of the speedy trial deadline where unsupported by citation to authority
- “‘Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.’”
- “‘Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”
- “Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”
- “Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”
- “Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The-Anh Nguyen v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-01-27· cited 63×
- Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-11· cited 55×
- State Of Washington v. Mario R Guevara-diazCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-01-27· cited 54×
- Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-04-14· cited 48×
- Columbia Asset Recovery Group, LLC v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-04· cited 23×
- Sarah Gosney, Res/cross-apps. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., Apps/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-05-31· cited 21×
- State v. DowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-21· cited 19×
- KING CTY. DEPT. OF ADULT DETEN. v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-27· cited 18×
- King County Department of Adult & Juvenile Detention v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-27· cited 17×
- State v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-11-21· cited 15×
- McCormick v. Dunn & Black, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-09-18· cited 14×
- Donner v. BlueCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-23· cited 9×
- In Re The Dependency Of: Z.A.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-12-26· cited 7×
- Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\\cross-apps.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-21· cited 4×
- House v. Estate of McCameyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-25· cited 3×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HaghighiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-04-16· cited 3×
- In Re HaghighiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-04-16· cited 2×
- Columbia Asset Recovery Group, Llc v. Joseph R. Kelly, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-04
- Dennis Bale, / Cross v. Robert E. Fletcher, / CrossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-11
- In Re The Dependency Of: Z.a.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-10-23
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 177×
- State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-16· cited 69×
- State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-11-08· cited 30×
- People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-07-24· cited 23×
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-04-22· cited 16×
- State v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-13· cited 7×
- State v. HyattCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.