Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 3/26/2019
State v. Loftis
Citations
- 830 S.E.2d 648
- 264 N.C. App. 652
Syllabus
In-custody statements Failure to move to suppress Procedural bar Stipulation to admission of evidence No special colloquy by trial court required
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because [Petitioner’s] actions indicate[d] an unmistakable intent to appeal [w]hat was lost solely because of the failure to timely act, we exercise our discretion and allow the petition for a writ of certiorari.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dietz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-10-03· cited 61×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-06-08· cited 17×
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2010-05-24· cited 1×
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-07-03· cited 1×
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-07-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.