Skip to main content
· 9/19/1997

State v. Locklin

Citations

  • 87 Wash. App. 1063
  • 1997 Wash. App. LEXIS 3507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court must simply “cite to evidence in the record that supports” its 4 “‘justifiable belief’ in the existence of an adequate alternative forum”
  • noting that where a district court dismisses a complaint on forum 1 The District Court exercised subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2
  • cautioning, nevertheless, that “[cjonditions cannot transform an inadequate forum into an adequate one”
  • court making adequate alternative forum determination must closely examine all submissions and cite to supporting evidence in record
  • “[A]n adequate forum does not exist if a statute of limitations bars the bringing of the case in that forum.”
  • “The defendant bears the burden of proof on all elements” in the forum non conveniens analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.