State v. L.M.O. (In re D.A.M.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ may discredit physicians’ opinions 10 that are “unsupported by the record as a whole . . . or by objective medical 11 findings”
• “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than one rational 11 interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
• “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than 8 one rational interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
• “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than 13 one rational interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
• “When the evidence before the ALJ is subject to more than 10 one rational interpretation, [the Court] must defer to the ALJ’s conclusion.”
• “[A]n ALJ may discredit treating physicians’ opinions that 11 are conclusory, brief, and unsupported by the record as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).