State v. Lloyd T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “case brought under § 43-247(3)(a) fits the definition of a ‘[c]hild custody proceeding’ under the UCCJEA, see § 43-1227(4), and that therefore, the UCCJEA is applicable”
• finding that the plain reading of the statute language “with or without counsel” indicates that the parent must actually be present in court for the statute to apply and that appearance by counsel alone does not trigger the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).