Skip to main content

State v. Lloyd

Citations

  • 199 Conn. 359
  • 507 A.2d 992
  • 1986 Conn. LEXIS 777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant, who failed to make specific factual allegations respecting his competency at the time of his sentencing hearing, failed to raise reasonable doubt upon issue
  • evidence of defendant’s involvement in drugs and his medical report were relevant but did not, alone, support vague, conclusory allegations of incompetency
  • ‘‘[D]efense counsel argued to the court that the defendant appeared to be confused and not to ‘understand everything that’s going on.’ Other than this assertion, there were no specific allegations concerning his competence to be sentenced.’’
  • allegations of cocaine use did not entitle defendant to competency hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Santaniello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.