Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/15/1986
State v. Lloyd
Citations
- 199 Conn. 359
- 507 A.2d 992
- 1986 Conn. LEXIS 777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant, who failed to make specific factual allegations respecting his competency at the time of his sentencing hearing, failed to raise reasonable doubt upon issue
- evidence of defendant’s involvement in drugs and his medical report were relevant but did not, alone, support vague, conclusory allegations of incompetency
- ‘‘[D]efense counsel argued to the court that the defendant appeared to be confused and not to ‘understand everything that’s going on.’ Other than this assertion, there were no specific allegations concerning his competence to be sentenced.’’
- allegations of cocaine use did not entitle defendant to competency hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Alexander V.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 97×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-06-17· cited 74×
- State v. WolffSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-09· cited 62×
- State v. George B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-12-25· cited 59×
- State v. DesLaurierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 43×
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-07-31· cited 19×
- People v. Wanda A.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-26· cited 15×
- State v. DesLaurierConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-08-17· cited 13×
- State v. PetersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-02-02· cited 13×
- State v. JaniceConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-11-07· cited 11×
- State v. MordaskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-10· cited 11×
- State v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-08-11· cited 7×
- State v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-04-15· cited 6×
- In Re Kaleb H.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-10-25· cited 4×
- State v. J.M.F.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-01-10· cited 4×
- State v. BeltonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-10· cited 1×
- State v. DortSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-30
- In re: Charles A.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-26
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 2,713×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-04-27· cited 212×
- Geza De Kaplany v. J. J. Enomoto, Director of California Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1976-07-09· cited 168×
- Albert v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 164×
- David L. Hansford v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1966-10-14· cited 96×
- Bernie Moore v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1972-08-18· cited 95×
- United States v. Barry Byron Mills, Daniel James Cavanaugh, Robbin Lynn Bryan Cavanaugh, Martin Trevino Vargas, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 1979-05-25· cited 85×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 72×
- United States v. Johnnie MasthersD.C. Circuit· 1976-06-15· cited 67×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-11· cited 56×
- United States v. Horace Edward HollisThird Circuit· 1977-12-29· cited 53×
- State v. LasherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-31· cited 44×
- United States v. Ruben FournierFirst Circuit· 1979-03-14· cited 27×
- Herman Edward Nelms v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1963-05-10· cited 24×
- United States v. Morris HallSecond Circuit· 1975-06-24· cited 23×
- United States v. Raymond MirandaSecond Circuit· 1971-02-05· cited 19×
- State v. DebobenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-29· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.