Skip to main content

State v. Lloyd

Citations

  • 185 Conn. 199
  • 440 A.2d 867
  • 1981 Conn. LEXIS 598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he linchpin of the speedy trial claim is a showing of prejudice . . . .”
  • prosecutor no longer has unfettered discretion to enter nolle but now needs approval of court and consent of defendant
  • entry of nolle prosquei, or denial of a speedy trial claim not final judgments
  • ‘‘[a]lthough the entry of a nolle prosequi results in the defendant’s release from custody, he can, within thirteen months; General Stat- utes § 54-142a [c]; be tried again upon a new information and a new arrest’’
  • ‘‘[a]lthough no immediate appeal would ordinarily lie solely from the entry of a nolle prosequi . . . or solely from the denial of a speedy trial claim . . . this case is different’’ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petebs, Bogdanski, Peters, Healey, Parskey, Armentano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.