State v. Ljubich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “we continue to adhere to the principle that we will not consider matters that are outside the record”
• “if the [a]ppellants were current in the[ir] monthly payments, this fact would constitute a meritorious defense”
• “[O]ur courts have long followed the rule that, without fraud, the return of service of a sheriff, which is complete on its face, is conclusive . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).