State v. Litscher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that section 5110(g) “precludes an effective date earlier than the effective date of the liberalizing law or regulation” authorizing benefits
• “Court’s holding in Kamas [, supra,] requires that in all cases YA fully adjudicate veteran’s claim under both the new and old law and regulation to determine the extent to which each may be favorable”
• en banc per curiam order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).