State v. Lisk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court may not depart downward based on the quantity of money stolen in a theft case based on the reasoning in Atwaters
• held that Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988), which cited State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1986), overruled State v. Pina, 487 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lacey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-20· cited 9×
• State v. Chapman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-19· cited 8×
• State v. Preston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-11· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mischler
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-03· cited 241×
• Atwaters v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-28· cited 44×
• State v. Pina
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-09· cited 8×