State v. LIRC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the word \received\ does not encompass health insurance premiums because such premiums never come into an employee's physical possession
• recognizing that worker's compensation system sets up \quasi-contractual status\ between worker and employer
• \Worker's compensation acts .. . are not to be interpreted in a manner as to transform their intent or to change their meaning.\
• \Worker's compensation acts ... are not to be interpreted in a manner as to transform their intent or to change their meaning.\
• \worker's compensation benefits derive solely from legislative enactments . . . [o]nly rights expressly conferred and liabilities expressly imposed are contemplated by the [legislature]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).