Wisconsin Supreme Court· 3/9/1987
State v. LIRC
Citations
- 401 N.W.2d 585
- 136 Wis. 2d 281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the word \received\ does not encompass health insurance premiums because such premiums never come into an employee's physical possession
- recognizing that worker's compensation system sets up \quasi-contractual status\ between worker and employer
- \Worker's compensation acts .. . are not to be interpreted in a manner as to transform their intent or to change their meaning.\
- \Worker's compensation acts ... are not to be interpreted in a manner as to transform their intent or to change their meaning.\
- \worker's compensation benefits derive solely from legislative enactments . . . [o]nly rights expressly conferred and liabilities expressly imposed are contemplated by the [legislature]\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heffernan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- County of La Crosse v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 18×
- Milwaukee County v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1996-09-12· cited 3×
- Opinion No. Oag 27-90, (1990)Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1990-08-30· cited 2×
- In re BrienE.D. Wisconsin· 1991-06-21· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-11-30· cited 113×
- Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-04-07· cited 74×
- Wilson-Raymond Constructors Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 30×
- State v. KernesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-02-22· cited 28×
- Sacotte v. Ideal-Werk Krug & Priester MacHinen-fabrikWisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-12-21· cited 28×
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-03-29· cited 27×
- Owens v. WardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1972-12-13· cited 26×
- Pigeon v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 24×
- Moore v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware· 1967-07-26· cited 23×
- HARRY CROW & SON, INC. v. Industrial Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1963-01-08· cited 18×
- Claim of Dick v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-01-29· cited 11×
- Frederico Granero Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-03· cited 11×
- Kozielec v. MacK Manufacturing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1953-12-31· cited 10×
- Copeland v. CopelandIndiana Court of Appeals· 1969-06-25· cited 10×
- Snyder Construction Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1969-06-30· cited 10×
- Scheeler v. North Pine Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.