State v. Lipsinic

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 8187

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant asserts the trial court erred by overruling his motion to suppress. The Defendant-appellant was a passenger in a vehicle which had been reported stolen. His seizure so that an investigation regarding the stolen vehicle report could be conducted did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Further, the pat down search of Defendant-appellant, which led to the discovery of the drugs at issue, did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Judgment affirmed.