State v. Lipcamon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “we have always held that a finding of contempt for a violation of a court order or an 10 injunction must be willful”
• relevant statute provided that the “court may hold a party in contempt for a violation of an order ... ”
• “We are not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and may inquire into whether it applied erroneous rules of law that materially affected its decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).