State v. Linnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating a judgment of conviction because of “[t]he cumulative effect” of an evidentiary error, improper interrogation of a witness by the trial court, and an inappropriate comment by the trial court on an issue of fact when instructing the jury
• judge’s comment that he did not think that there was much basis for justification defense was comment upon an issue of fact in a manner disparaging defendant’s theory of ease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).