Missouri Court of Appeals· 1/23/1996
State v. Link
Citations
- 916 S.W.2d 385
- 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 126
- 1996 WL 21745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- calling the defendant a predator was not prosecutorial misconduct; although the court did not condone the use of denuncitory epithets towards defendants, the characterization had no decisive effect on the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhard, Karohl, Dowd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MaybinCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-03-17· cited 21×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-11-19· cited 15×
- State v. WaymanMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-07-23· cited 10×
- State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-01-28· cited 10×
- State v. O'HaraMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-09-17· cited 2×
- State v. McNealMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-04-30
- State v. CostelloMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-05-20
- State v. BillupsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-04-29
- State v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-16
- State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-11-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.