State v. Lian-Wen Chen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• maintaining that it was jury’s province to accept or reject part or all of the witness testimony, in concluding that accident resulted in a pedestrian’s death
• maintaining that it was jury's province to accept or reject part or all of the witness testimony, in concluding that accident resulted in a pedestrian's death
• addressing the predecessor statute to § 291C-12.5 and stating that “[t]he statutory language is broad, hinging criminal liability for failing to give information and to render aid on involvement in the incident” (emphasis added)
• “The purpose of statutes like [Haw. Rev. Stat. section 291C-12.5] . . . is to pro- tect those injured . . . and [to] facilitate a determination of civil and criminal liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).