State v. Leyda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[V]alue is not an essential element of second degree identity theft and need not be alleged in the charging document.”
• the value of goods, services, and credit obtained through identity theft is not an essential element of second degree theft
• identity theft is a continuing crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).