State v. Leyba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prosecutor’s remarks with respect to missing witness inference ‘suggest that a defendant has some duty to produce witnesses or has some burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cobb
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
• State v. Ruffino
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 93×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 88×
• State v. Day
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-02-07· cited 85×
• State v. Gallegos
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-10-31· cited 29×
• State v. Palmer
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-06-29· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Hale
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 969×
• State v. Caron
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-05-10· cited 177×
• People v. Mirenda
  New York Court of Appeals· 1969-01-09· cited 157×
• State v. Vallejos
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-01-30· cited 64×
• The United States of America v. Aubrey Westley Miller
  Tenth Circuit· 1972-05-25· cited 58×
• United States v. Arthur Smith, United States of America v. Harry Chrabaszewski
  Sixth Circuit· 1974-07-16· cited 51×
• State v. Lara
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-07-30· cited 43×
• United States v. Johnny Ray Smith
  Fifth Circuit· 1971-02-04· cited 42×
• People v. Thomas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-09-25· cited 21×
• State v. Jones
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-10-31· cited 15×