State v. Lettice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Beringer “factually and procedurally” and adopting the limited extension of Wallach II
• distinguishing Beringer \factually and procedurally\ and adopting the limited extension of Wallach II
• \Whether a prosecutor intended to provoke a mistrial... is a question of fact. . . .\
• Retrial after a mistrial of same charges requires \manifest necessity\ where the initial \trial is terminated over defendant's objection and without his or her consent.\
• The Wisconsin Constitution provides the same protection against double jeopardy as the United States Constitution.
• legal issue— alleged double-jeopardy violation; prosecutor's intent a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).