Arizona Supreme Court· 7/5/1983
State v. Leslie
Citations
- 666 P.2d 1072
- 136 Ariz. 463
- 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for a new trial after judge had telephone conversations with the victim’s relatives prior to capital sentencing
- after the jury found defendant guilty but before sentencing, the judge solicited contact with the victim’s relatives; held: contact with the victim’s relatives necessitated the judge’s disqualification from the proceedings
- after the jury found defendant guilty but before sentencing, the judge solicited contact with the victim's relatives; held: contact with the victim's relatives necessitated the judge's disqualification from the proceedings
- no abuse of discretion for trial judge to grant new trial pursuant to preamendment A.R.S. § 13-703(B) after original trial judge was disqualified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LeslieArizona Supreme Court· 1985-10-09· cited 54×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 2002-07-29· cited 35×
- State v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-03-18· cited 35×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-03-04· cited 16×
- State v. EmanuelCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-01-19· cited 8×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-19
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.