Skip to main content
· 5/17/2011

State v. Lenkart

Citations

  • 2011 UT 27
  • 262 P.3d 1
  • 2011 WL 1854180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no reason . . . to depart from the standard of review set out in Strickland simply because the appeal was preceded by a motion for new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nehring, Durham, Durrant, Parrish, Lee, Nehring'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.