Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/8/2024

State v. Lenhart

Citations

2024 Ohio 462

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application for reopening ineffective assistance of appellate counsel successive applications untimely application good cause. The successive, untimely application to reopen was denied where there is no right to successive applications under App.R. 26(B) and the application was untimely filed without a showing of good cause for the delay.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Fields
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
United States v. Cronic
Supreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
State v. Murnahan
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-08· cited 76×
State v. Fox
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 47×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-06-17· cited 22×
State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-04-16· cited 18×
State v. Meadows
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-26· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.