Skip to main content

State v. Lenard

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3228

Syllabus

Denial of motion for new trial without a hearing new evidence direct appeal res judicata voir dire juror bias abuse of discretion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion for a new trial without a hearing. The evidence appellant relied on was not newly discovered evidence his motion was untimely and his claims of irregularity in voir dire, juror bias and ineffective assistance were barred under the doctrine of res judicata —they either were already raised and decided or could have been raised on direct appeal.

Judges: O'Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.