State v. Lemieux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.8 which provides a similar evidentiary hearing requirement in post-conviction proceedings
• in determining whether defendant has stated a colorable claim for relief, allegations are viewed in light of entire record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wagstaff
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-07· cited 96×
• State v. Allen
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1987-10-28· cited 34×
• Stanley v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 29×
• State v. Sasak
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-11-09· cited 24×
• State v. Freeland
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-27· cited 19×
• State v. Verdugo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-17· cited 10×
• State v. Diaz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 8×
• State v. Chairez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-06-17· cited 6×
• Turner v. State
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-06-20· cited 4×
• State v. Diaz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-24· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Richmond
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
• Broncucia v. Colorado
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 188×
• State v. Pritchett
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-12-23· cited 13×
• State v. Geiger
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-07-15· cited 12×
• State v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-01-31· cited 5×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-04-26· cited 4×