Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2/23/1993

State v. LeGrand

Citations

501 N.W.2d 59
1993 Iowa App. LEXIS 23
1993 WL 141667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding no abuse of discretion in admitting new, “substantive testimony” despite it “put[ting] a burden on the defense attorney who had conscientiously prepared for trial”
rejecting such an argument where the district court’s comments were based on facts in the record and the defendant’s criminal history
noting the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed the late-noticed witnesses to testify after the court “provided the defendant’s counsel the opportunity to interview the witnesses”
“The question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in allowing defense attorneys to interview the additional witnesses, but not excluding the witnesses or continuing the case.”
examining Iowa R. Crim. P. 18(3), now renumbered 2.19(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oxberger, Sackett, Habhab

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.