Skip to main content
· 6/17/2008

State v. Leenhouts

Citations

  • 185 P.3d 132
  • 218 Ariz. 346
  • 533 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 42
  • 2008 Ariz. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the elements required to prove a violation of subsection A.1 [of A.R.S. § 13-1302] differ from those required to prove a violation of subsection A.3, the original and supervening indictments do not allege the same charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.