· 6/17/2008
State v. Leenhouts
Citations
- 185 P.3d 132
- 218 Ariz. 346
- 533 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 42
- 2008 Ariz. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the elements required to prove a violation of subsection A.1 [of A.R.S. § 13-1302] differ from those required to prove a violation of subsection A.3, the original and supervening indictments do not allege the same charge.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz, Bales
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.