Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/12/2010
State v. LEE-GRIGG
Citations
- 692 S.E.2d 895
- 387 S.C. 310
- 2010 S.C. LEXIS 116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Intent is a question of fact and is ordinarily for jury determination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Waller, Beatty, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 97×
- State v. PradubsriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-05-01· cited 16×
- State v. ReynuaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-12-05· cited 11×
- Johnson ex rel. Estate of Valenzuela v. Sam English Grading, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-05-06· cited 10×
- Pantovich v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 319×
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 75×
- State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
- State v. JefferiesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-05· cited 45×
- State v. Lee-GriggCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 22×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-07-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.