Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/8/1982
State v. Lee
Citations
- 56 Or. App. 147
- 641 P.2d 589
- 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- photo throwdown was suggestive where the “defendant’s was the only picture of a white man with short, dark curly hair”
- “[T]he fact that the witness * * * was not told that the suspect was among the samples is not determinative on the issue of suggestiveness.”
- identification was reliable where the witness had “at least two face-to-face encounters with the suspicious man” and, during the second encounter, “took special note of his appearance”
- voice identification procedure was suggestive where, although six recordings were played for the witnesses, the recording of the defendant’s voice was unscripted and contained background noise and therefore sounded more natural than the others
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoomissen, Joseph, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-13· cited 98×
- State v. CarceranoOregon Supreme Court· 1964-04-08· cited 26×
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-05-02· cited 14×
- State v. McBainCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-03-22· cited 12×
- United States v. Otero-HernandezM.D. Florida· 1976-08-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.