Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/12/2024
State v. Lee
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 4498
Syllabus
Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. A Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal is not a valid method for challenging the state's satisfaction of its burden in disproving self-defense under R.C. 2901.05(B)(1). Appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Boggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. MessengerOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-21· cited 321×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 266×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-10· cited 126×
- State v. CarneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-28· cited 91×
- State v. MessengerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-17· cited 68×
- State v. KeanOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-29· cited 31×
- State v. CervantesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 22×
- State v. HaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-28· cited 18×
- State v. ZafarOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-16· cited 17×
- State v. BentleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-30· cited 13×
- State v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-25· cited 12×
- State v. AngelOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-09· cited 11×
- State v. JamiiOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21· cited 9×
- State v. VinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-16· cited 5×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-16· cited 5×
- State v. ColonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.