New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/31/2020
State v. Ledbetter
Citations
- 472 P.3d 1287
- 2020 NMCA 046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing conviction for residential burglary because the State “did not present sufficient evidence to establish … that Defendant entered the dwelling [without authorization and] with the intent to commit a theft or criminal damage to property”
- reversing conviction for residential burglary because the State “did not present sufficient evidence to establish … that Defendant entered the dwelling [without authorization and] with the intent to commit a theft or criminal damage to property”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 185×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-02· cited 184×
- State v. DowlingNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-04-12· cited 88×
- State v. ParisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-05-16· cited 64×
- State v. JenningsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-12-07· cited 33×
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 29×
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-01-12· cited 28×
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-03-09· cited 22×
- Bowman v. Incorporated County of Los AlamosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-04-16· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.