State v. Lea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking some or all of a witness’s testimony may be an appropriate remedy for that person’s refusal to answer questions on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bogguess
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-01-20· cited 80×
• State v. Najibi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-24· cited 13×
• State v. Strickland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-20· cited 4×
• State v. Martinez-Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-25· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• Lem Woon v. Oregon
  Supreme Court· 1913-06-09· cited 143×
• State v. Fish
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 76×
• State v. Mende
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-08-24· cited 55×
• State v. Deal
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1908-11-24· cited 26×
• State v. Quintero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 15×
• State v. Stilwell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1923-12-18· cited 13×
• State v. Cruse
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-06-27· cited 11×
• State v. Wise
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-05-14· cited 8×
• State v. Quintero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 8×
• State v. Gallo
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1890-02-11· cited 7×
• State v. Pew
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-04-23· cited 6×