Skip to main content

State v. Layton

Citations

  • 497 P.2d 559
  • 53 Haw. 513
  • 1972 Haw. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing circuit court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss indictment where record was silent as to “whether the prosecution deliberately relied upon hearsay alone when better evidence was readily available for presentation to the grand jury”
  • holding it is a “policy expression and not . . . a hard and fast rule” that “hearsay evidence should only be used when direct testimony is unavailable or when it is demonstrably inconvenient to summon witnesses able to testify to facts from personal knowledge” (cleaned up).
  • \Hearsay evidence should only be used [in a grand jury proceeding] when direct testimony is unavailable or when it is demonstrably inconvenient to summon witnesses able to testify to facts from personal knowledge.\ (quoting United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2d Cir.1966)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Marumoto, Abe, Levinson, Kobayashi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.