Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/19/1976
State v. Lay
Citations
- 546 P.2d 41
- 26 Ariz. App. 64
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 770
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a probationer's admission to a probation officer of a violation is sufficient and does not require corroboration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eubank, Nelson, Haire
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-10-17· cited 54×
- People v. ManzanaresColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-10-09· cited 32×
- Selph v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-09-11· cited 25×
- People v. MonetteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-06-15· cited 22×
- State v. Graham MacKerMontana Supreme Court· 2014-01-07· cited 5×
- State v. Lynn C.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-12-10· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.