New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/10/1955
State v. Lawson
Citations
- 286 P.2d 1076
- 59 N.M. 482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding burglary tools defined in part as “adapted, designed or commonly used” to commit a burglary is not void for indefiniteness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGhee, Compton, Lujan, Sadler, Kiker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-12-09· cited 60×
- People v. ChastainSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-03-16· cited 55×
- State v. EverittNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-02-07· cited 47×
- State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-05-23· cited 34×
- State v. CraigNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-06-05· cited 25×
- State v. NajeraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-09-14· cited 24×
- Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-11-19· cited 17×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2020-12-10· cited 12×
- State v. DensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-11-01· cited 10×
- State v. LefthandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-09-03· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- Youngs Rubber Corporation v. CI Lee & Co.Second Circuit· 1930-12-15· cited 31×
- Masters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1914-05-26· cited 16×
- State v. BlacklockNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-09-13· cited 15×
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-01-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.