Washington Supreme Court· 1/6/1911

State v. Laws

Citations

61 Wash. 533
112 P. 488
1911 Wash. LEXIS 1115

Syllabus

<p>Indictment and Infobmation — Duplicity—Laeceny. An information for larceny is not bad for duplicity in that it charges the stealing of specified articles from the persons of, and belonging to, two parties, where prima facie, both occurred at the same time and place and constituted but a single transaction (overruling State v. Bliss, 27 Wash. 463).</p>

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Klasner
New Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-02-12· cited 31×
State v. Makovsky
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-01-25· cited 6×
State v. McCollum
Washington Supreme Court· 1943-03-16· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Warren
Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-03-14· cited 40×
People v. Johnson
Michigan Supreme Court· 1890-06-27· cited 38×
State v. Nelson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1849-04-15· cited 36×
State v. Bliss
Washington Supreme Court· 1902-03-01· cited 23×
State v. McCormick
Washington Supreme Court· 1909-12-27· cited 23×
United States v. Scott
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky· 1895-10-07· cited 15×
Alexander v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia· 1894-12-20· cited 13×
State v. Paul
Supreme Court of Iowa· 1891-01-21· cited 10×
State v. Butts
Washington Supreme Court· 1906-03-26· cited 6×
Bushman v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1885-02-26· cited 6×
United States v. Patty
E.D. Wisconsin· 1880-07-01· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.