State v. Lawrence
Citations
- 108 Miss. 291
- 66 So. 745
Syllabus
<p>1. Licenses. Vehicle taxes. Validity. Constitutional law. Class leg- ■ islation. Classification. Uniformity.</p> <p>The legislature has full power over the public roads, and can make all needful regulations concerning the use thereof, and can provide means by which they may be improved and kept up, and hence had the power to enact Laws 1914, chapter 120, section 2, imposing a privilege tax upon automobiles and motor cycles for the use of the public roads and directing the payment thereof into the road fund.</p> <p>2. Constitutional Law. Class legislation. Classification.</p> <p>The classification of the vehicles in the Laws 1914, chapter 120, section 2, is reasonable and proper and not objectionable as class, legislation.</p> <p>8. Constitutional Law. Discriminatory legislation.</p> <p>The fact that Laws 1914, chapter 120, section 2, permits a nonresident, who has complied with the laws of his state as to registration of his vehicles, to drive the same in this state for 60 days, without paying the tax or registration fee therein provided for, does not invalidate the law as discriminating against a resident of this state.</p> <p>4. Licenses. Vehicle tax. Uniformity.</p> <p>The equality and uniformity clause of the Constitution applies only to ad valorem taxes, for general purposes and the tax imposed by Laws 1914, chapter 120, section 2, upon the privilege of driving motor vehicles any cycles being purely a privilege tax, is not violative of the equality and uniformity clause of the Constitution.</p>
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1924-05-14· cited 41×
- Camas Stage Co. v. KozerOregon Supreme Court· 1922-07-29· cited 36×
- Briedwell v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court· 1921-02-08· cited 22×
- Mississippi Bd. of Nursing v. BelkMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-12-11· cited 20×
- Pine Bluff Transfer Co. v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1919-10-27· cited 7×
- Donahoo v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1955-12-09· cited 6×
- Snapp v. NealMississippi Supreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 5×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-06-21· cited 105×
- Daily v. SwopeMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-10-15· cited 46×
- Vicksburg Bank v. WorrellMississippi Supreme Court· 1889-10-15· cited 21×
- Clarksdale Insurance Agency v. ColeMississippi Supreme Court· 1905-11-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.