Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/2/2012
State v. Lawrence
Citations
- 271 P.3d 280
- 166 Wash. App. 378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The expert opinion that Mr. Lawrence was competent provided a tenable basis for the trial court's legal ruling.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Korsmo, Kulik, Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 1,118×
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 217×
- City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 166×
- State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-16· cited 152×
- State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 139×
- State v. MadsenWashington Supreme Court· 2010-03-25· cited 131×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RhomeWashington Supreme Court· 2011-09-15· cited 79×
- State v. KolocotronisWashington Supreme Court· 1968-01-25· cited 69×
- State v. HahnWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-09· cited 67×
- State ex rel. Mackintosh v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1907-01-05· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.