State v. Lawrence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “it would be anomalous to treat” a person taken into protective civil custody for detoxification “the same as one in full custody arrest for a criminal offense” because “[w]hat is reasonable in the latter case may not be in the former”
• person taken into protective civil custody for detoxification was not arrested in the criminal sense
• where person was taken into protective civil custody for detoxification, only pat-down search of the person and limited inventory search, not including opening closed containers, was permissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Perry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 63×
• State v. Lippert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-19· cited 13×
• State v. Okeke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-12· cited 12×
• Lindsey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-30· cited 10×
• State v. Lippert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-04-22· cited 7×
• State v. Keyes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-02-02· cited 6×
• State v. Perry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-04· cited 3×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-10· cited 1×
• State v. Molatore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-07-06· cited 1×
• State v. Wilcox
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2025-11-25· cited 1×
• State v. Adams
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2025-08-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
• United States v. Chadwick
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
• State v. Elkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-12-28· cited 156×
• State v. Newman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 49×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-09-22· cited 32×
• State v. Marsh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-12-18· cited 8×