Skip to main content
· 4/27/2020

State v. Latocha

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 2664

Syllabus

Convictions for violation of 959.131(D)(1) and (D)(2) were supported by sufficient evidence. Appellant did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court's order of forfeiture of companion animals and prohibition against having companion animals in the future was within its proper discretion pursuant to R.C. 959.99(E)(6)(a).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.