· 4/27/2020
State v. Latocha
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2664
Syllabus
Convictions for violation of 959.131(D)(1) and (D)(2) were supported by sufficient evidence. Appellant did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court's order of forfeiture of companion animals and prohibition against having companion animals in the future was within its proper discretion pursuant to R.C. 959.99(E)(6)(a).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.