State v. Latham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The deprivation of any ownership interest, including an undivided share, in the property taken, will support a robbery conviction. Also, ‘[a] taking from one having the care, custody, control, management, or possession of the property is sufficient.’ ” (alteration in original
• interpreting \personal property\ under the robbery statute, RCW 9A.56.190

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brockob
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 202×
• State v. Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 186×
• State v. Tvedt
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 108×
• State v. Pike
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-03-05· cited 53×
• People v. Bekele
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-04-07· cited 30×
• State Of Washington v. Michael William Richie
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-22· cited 23×
• State v. Nelson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2018-06-14· cited 20×
• State v. Larkin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-03· cited 17×
• People v. Jones
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-02-20· cited 13×
• State v. Bacani
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-09-25· cited 11×
• State v. Graham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-18· cited 9×
• State v. Longshore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-27· cited 5×
• State v. Saldano
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-05· cited 4×
• State v. Tvedt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-01· cited 4×
• State v. Pike
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-02-26· cited 3×
• State v. Brockob
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-01-26· cited 2×
• People v. Williams
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-11-28