Skip to main content

State v. Latham

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 495

Syllabus

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the judgment, finding the defendant demonstrated application of the statute, limiting his Second Amendment rights, was unconstitutional as applied to the facts of the case, with the state failing to proffer historical analogue to support the specific application of the statutory limitation to the circumstances of the defendant's case.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.