State v. Latham
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 495
Syllabus
Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the judgment, finding the defendant demonstrated application of the statute, limiting his Second Amendment rights, was unconstitutional as applied to the facts of the case, with the state failing to proffer historical analogue to support the specific application of the statutory limitation to the circumstances of the defendant's case.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court· 2022-06-23· cited 2,263×
- United States v. RahimiSupreme Court· 2024-06-21· cited 416×
- United States v. Erick WilliamsSixth Circuit· 2024-08-23· cited 129×
- United States v. RahimiFifth Circuit· 2023-03-02· cited 93×
- State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 52×
- United States v. ConnellyFifth Circuit· 2024-08-28· cited 43×
- United States v. DanielsFifth Circuit· 2023-08-09· cited 37×
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County· 2017-05-19· cited 7×
- State v. BarberOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.