State v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a defendant who challenges his or her entire sentencing plan on appeal has no legitimate expectation in the finality of any discrete part of the original sentence
• “The guaranty against double jeopardy requires * * * that time served on the previous * * * sentence be fully credited toward the revised * * * sentence”
• no Pearce presumption arose where \revised aggregate sentence is less severe than [defendant's] original aggregate sentence\ and revised sentence \is fully explained by the trial court's original sentencing intent\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Twigg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-28· cited 37×
• State v. Wade
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-06· cited 29×
• State v. Christian (Slip Opinion)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-10· cited 24×
• State v. Brown
  Washington Supreme Court· 2019-05-02· cited 17×
• Amir H. Sanjari v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-01-15· cited 16×
• State v. Fisher
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 15×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-02· cited 15×
• Jorge Rodriguez Jr. v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2024-12-04