State v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where a caller’s identity is readily ascertainable, the caller is a known citizen informant, not an anonymous tipster
• noting “tipster” provided description of suspect and “first-hand observations” of reported events as they were occurring, and officer’s observations partially corroborated “tip”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bishop
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 158×
• State v. Van Dorne
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2004-03-16· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Kelly
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-12-22· cited 21×
• State v. Byrum
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2020-10-15· cited 21×
• State v. Salato
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2001-12-13· cited 16×
• State v. Alexander
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-10-09· cited 15×
• State v. Zapata-Reyes
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-09-26· cited 13×
• State v. Deccio
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2001-10-31· cited 9×
• State v. Swindle
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-06-22· cited 7×
• State v. Couch
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2021-10-22· cited 3×
• State v. Scheid
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2025-02-26· cited 3×
• State v. Filip Danney
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-11-05