State v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing this principle at a time roughly contemporaneous with the drafting of the Washington State Constitution
• court cannot determine sufficient recency without dates for “recent” marijuana purchases
• court cannot determine sufficient recency without dates for \recent\ marijuana purchases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Seattle v. McCready
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-02-24· cited 158×
• State v. Patterson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-09· cited 30×
• State v. Christiansen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-11· cited 20×
• State v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-08-15· cited 5×
• State v. Lyons
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-02-10· cited 1×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-04-28· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aguilar v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• Jones v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
• United States v. Ventresca
  Supreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
• Nathanson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 629×
• State v. Walcott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-12-28· cited 72×
• Frontier Lanes v. CANADIAN INDEMNITY
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-02· cited 18×
• State v. Spencer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-06-08· cited 15×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-12-23· cited 15×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-06· cited 13×