State v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \no greater estate or interest should be taken than is reasonably necessary to accomplish the public use or necessity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Petition of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-12-24· cited 57×
• Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 41×
• HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail Authority
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 41×
• Coronado Oil Co. v. Grieves
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1982-03-15· cited 38×
• State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Chavez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 24×
• Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla Walla
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 23×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-02-18· cited 21×
• The Acquisition of Property by Eminent Domain, Unified School District No. 365 v. Diebolt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-03-21· cited 19×
• Utah State Road Commission v. Johnson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1976-05-20· cited 16×
• Foster v. Mississippi State Highway Commission
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1962-04-23· cited 13×
• Port of Seattle v. Equitable Capital Group, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-07-13· cited 12×
• State v. Hobart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-07-29· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Donaldson v. Greenwood
  Washington Supreme Court· 1952-04-03· cited 64×
• State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-02-23· cited 23×
• State v. MOTTMAN MERC. CO., INC.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1958-02-20· cited 22×
• Port Townsend Southern Railroad v. Barbare
  Washington Supreme Court· 1907-04-15· cited 16×