State v. Larsen-Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] motorist’s subjective beliefs [about the accuracy of the officer’s warnings] are insufficient justification for refusing to comply with the mandates of the Implied Consent Law.”
• summarizing the principles of O’Connell and its progeny and requiring O’Connell warnings “whenever an officer requests a motorist to submit to chemical testing”
• driver did not believe the officer’s warning
• driver did not believe the officer’s warning
• driver did not believe the officer's warning
• driver did not believe the officer's warning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).