State v. Larry L. Labrecque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an alcohol distributor was not the agent of a wholesaler even though the wholesaler had veto power over the distributor’s marketing plan and pricing structures
• finding that an alcohol distributor was not the agent of a wholesaler even though the wholesaler had veto power over the distributor's marketing plan and pricing structures
• holding non-deferential review warranted because “the commission drew no inferences from the unambiguous agreement other than its ultimate finding, which, no matter how couched, is in fact a conclusion of law that an agency relationship existed”
• holding non-deferential review warranted because “the commission drew no inferences' from the unambiguous agreement other than its ultimate finding, which, no matter how couched, is in fact a conclusion of law that an agency relationship existed”
• “the question of agency becomes one of law in those instances where the relationship is found to exist on the basis of undisputed facts or unambiguous written documents”
• “the question of agency becomes one of law in those instances where the relationship is found to exist on the basis of undisputed facts or unambiguous written documents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).